Templates for Christian Experience

Are Biblical Narratives meant to be templates for Christian Experience?

2026-10-01 by Steve Forkin

The Pentecostal & Charismatic denominations are the ones who press the hardest on the notion of Christian experience. Importantly, the giving the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost is turned into a de-facto & universal template for all believers in all times and places.

thumbnail
stories christian experience

Templates for Christian Experience

Are Biblical Narratives meant to be templates for Christian Experience?

Having grown up in the Pentecostal movement, I used to be convinced that Acts chapter two was the de-facto template for all believers, and that in fact all believers were meant to experience the giving and receiving of the Holy Spirit in the exact same way as the early Apostles and Disciples did.

Sadly, the theology behind this idea is firstly driven by the experience itself and only secondarily by the actual passages of scripture that are turned into a template.

At some point in my Christian journey I started to ask myself some hard questions, amongst them also the question of “Is what I have experienced in the Pentecostal world actually what is described in the New Testament?” or could it be that I had a certain experience and thereafter sought for Bible passages that fit the experience. Could it further be that the experiences didn’t actually fit the Bible passages, which raised even more questions.

I believe – having had opportunity to chat with many people who started their Christian journey in one of the many Pentecostal or Charismatic churches – that many are too afraid to actually ask the hard questions, given the depth & breadth of the experiences, people consider it unthinkable that they might have experienced a form of Psychological phenomena quite unrelated to scripture.

For many this is a bridge too far. Frightened, they continue on the same journey. For some, like me the experiences just did not add up, so question we must.

My journey of questions relating in particular to the “Gift of Tongues” ended up, with me writing a book on the subject. If you have questions on this subject, can I recommend you buy the book? That is certainly one way you can support my ministry here on substack.

https://www.amazon.com.au/Speaking-Tongues-Authentic-Strange-Fire-ebook/dp/B0C62ZM8ND

If you are anything like me, when someone says, “this is the right method of Biblical interpretation”, I immediately ask, “How so?”

I have been to Seminary, and completed a masters in Theology and Apologetics. I am well aware of the science of biblical interpretation, having studied it in-depth. But, I am also desirous to be a lay person when I read scripture as I firmly believe scripture has been written in a way that all believers can understand the important parts, given the use of the right tools and methods of interpretation.

The hard question we must therefore ask again and again, what is the right way to interpret scripture? Apart from the plain logic behind the notion that “meanings of terms are determined by their use within the context they are written in,” what other specifics can we actually derive from the text of scripture itself?

Btw, I never cease to be amazed by lay people and serious theologians alike who are willing to “import” the meaning of terms used in another context, when the plain meaning of them, jumping out from the context of the passage does not seem to fit the pre-conceived idea – often derived from a particular denominational bias – or docrine. We are all subject to the desire to press our particular denominational bent onto a passage of scripture, especially those who claim to never do this.

The issue in this article is the one of “experience of receiving the Holy Spirit” as per the Book of Acts chapter 2:1-4. The very basics of Pentecostal Theology stipulates that the way the 120 disciples waiting in the Upper Room, for the sending of the Holy Spirit – as foretold by Christ, the Messiah, is the way believers today, can and should receive the Spirit.

The claim here is that this day or moment in the life of the church is the defacto template for all believers. Some Pentecostals – those of the more extreme kind – claim that in order to be saved one must Speak in Tongues, just like those in the Upper Room. The more mainstream view is that this a second order experience, they call the “Baptism in the Holy Spirit”.

Regardless, what we have in Acts two, is the universal template for Christian experience, they say. Two immediate problems arise from this and they are encapsulated in the following two questions:

If you are unsure, please don’t take my word for it, simply read the three events in the Book of Acts where we have actual details of how people received the Spirit and see whether the template – so-called – fits.

Here are the material facts of the giving & receiving of the Spirit in Acts 2:

The Book of Acts was written by Luke, one of the travelling companions of the Apostle Paul. It’s likely Luke, was even with Paul when he wrote to the Corinthians, the first letter that has the other passages on the gift of tongues – chapter 12 being the one that causes the biggest problem for the template theology paradigm. A careful reading of the giving of the gifts of the Spirit and the rhetorical questions Paul asks, leaves the honest student in no doubt. This once again, provides what I again would suggest, is an unsurmountable hurdle for Pentecostalism.

Having said all that, I am still left with this lingering question, “Are Bible Storeis meant to be templates for our experience?”

Here I would like to draw on two defining moments in the broader history of God’s people and whilst these passages don’t directly answer the question, they do very strongly suggest what the answer must be. This again shows that the Bible is an amazing book that gives us all the tools in its own pages on how we should correctly understand it.

Let’s dig in.

Narrative 1: “The Giving of the Law”

Let’s turn the idea that Bible narratives are templates for experience into a sylogism. It will immediately become apparent that this is an erroneous way to interpret scripture.

Notice here that I have been at least somewhat generous by reducing P1 to “sometimes” and I think based on this P2 is a reasonable deduction. Notice also that the giving of the law was miraculous and universally applicable. Here I would suggest you read the parallel passages in Exodus 19, 20 and onwards to get the bigger picture. Jews broadly, still believe today that this was the most significant of all the miracles given in the Old Testament – second perhaps to the act of creation itself. The Exodus story is the defacto definitional event in the story of Israel and the Jewish people.

Yet, what we all intuitively and immediately recognise is this. All Jews understand that the law was given to them all, throughout history, yet the experience of receiving the law is not at all a template.

Please note what the Apostle Paul tells us about the universal applicability of the law, in his letter to the Romans. Read the entire chapter two to get the bigger picture.

Narrative 2: “The Giving of the King”

Second, perhaps in significance and certainly in universal applicability, was the experience of being given a King to rule over Israel. We see how this unfolds, after the book of Judges, where the sinful state of Israel becomes worse and worse, ever more turning aside to their own ways. God’s design for his people was for each individual to be under God, submitted to his Holy Law. Additionally, God provided prophets & judges for his people, acting as what we might call “the sword of justice” for the times of much needed Spiritual correction and discipline.

Then the children of Israel demand a King to rule over them. They want a worldly king who will fight their battles for them. They quite literally refuse to trust in power of almighty God. The result is disastrous for them.

Contrary to God’s original design, God gives what the people want and instructs the prophet to give them the details they likely did not want to hear..

Here it is important to note that whilst this experience does not result in a miracle they all see, but it does result in the next King – King David – being a Godly king who does show forth God’s power and shows them how righteousness does indeed exalt a whole nation. The ongoing history of the Kings of Israel and Judah, is a very mixed bag. There are some good kings – during whose reign there are times of universal reformation and revival, and yet many of the kings quite literally are the cause of the descent into terrible sin and the eventual wars with Assyria and Babylon resulting in the second exile.

Whilst this second example isn’t as obvious – in a more personal sense – as the giving of the law, it does also make my earlier observation quite clearly.

Biblical Stories or Narratives are not meant to be turned into templates for Universal Experience

If, as the Pentecostal Theologians want us to believe, Acts 2 is a template for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, then those receiving it today should experience the same thing, and the Pauline letters need to be seriously redefined. These two issues stand quite like a brick wall in the way.

Perhaps as a final comment, I am reminded of the many Pentecostal and Charismatic claims that modern believers are to be miracle workers just like Jesus. The idea is that since Jesus could and did those miracles, we should likewise be able to. I have written at length about the reasons why this is the wrong way to read the gospel accounts of the life of Christ. The hardest brick wall – here too – is what I would call reality. When Pentecostals and Charismatics get sick, really sick, and they pray just like all other believers tend to do when faced with sickness. That is when the rubber hits the road. That is the litmus test of sound Biblical theology correctly applied. Often it is sickness experienced, endured and walked through, that causes people who have bad theology to adjust and re-read scripture.

At no point in this article did I want you to get the idea that Pentecostals are not true Christians. I was merely trying to evaluate their claims against the text of scripture, in the hope that this might help people to refocus on Christ and Christ alone!

For further discussion - join the comments on Substack: